<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;A Reality Check for Newspapers&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Learning on Your Terms</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Butler</title>
		<link>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-19027</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 04:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-19027</guid>
		<description>In language teaching it is not just the individual pieces (learning objects) that are so important (to schools). It is the ability to put the pieces together into a coherent whole (a class or a course).

Many Internet sites already exist that offer a range of supplemental materials in a wild form. Indeed, a form of teacher "exchanges" existed even before the Internet.

These materials in the wild however need to be tamed. It isn't enough to just publish them. 

More importantly, in your aggregate world, existing supplemental materials would have to be re-engineered so that that they could be directly consumed by the students without outside professional assistance. These kinds of materials are in the minority at present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In language teaching it is not just the individual pieces (learning objects) that are so important (to schools). It is the ability to put the pieces together into a coherent whole (a class or a course).</p>
<p>Many Internet sites already exist that offer a range of supplemental materials in a wild form. Indeed, a form of teacher &#8220;exchanges&#8221; existed even before the Internet.</p>
<p>These materials in the wild however need to be tamed. It isn&#8217;t enough to just publish them. </p>
<p>More importantly, in your aggregate world, existing supplemental materials would have to be re-engineered so that that they could be directly consumed by the students without outside professional assistance. These kinds of materials are in the minority at present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantian</title>
		<link>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-19026</link>
		<dc:creator>Lantian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 04:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-19026</guid>
		<description>VCR - I wish I could buy a VCR in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VCR - I wish I could buy a VCR in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Horkoff</title>
		<link>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Horkoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.praxislanguage.com/2007/05/08/a-reality-check-for-newspapers/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>"they want to pick and choose what’s of interest to them, without having to pay for or wade through what isn’t."

This sounds somewhat ironic considering WSJ has a million paid subscribers.  A good continuation to the debate:

http://lsvp.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/contrarian-viewpoint-on-the-future-of-newspapers/ (blocked in China)

I am interested in the implications on training media. Are textbook lessons going to be unbundled and commoditized as well? If 'user-generated content' is creating a content flood that is burying professional content, couldn't a 'teacher-generated content' driven social network do the same thing to educational publishing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they want to pick and choose what’s of interest to them, without having to pay for or wade through what isn’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sounds somewhat ironic considering WSJ has a million paid subscribers.  A good continuation to the debate:</p>
<p><a href="http://lsvp.wordpress.com/2007/05/08/contrarian-viewpoint-on-the-future-of-newspapers/" rel="nofollow">http://lsvp.wordpress.com/2007.....ewspapers/</a> (blocked in China)</p>
<p>I am interested in the implications on training media. Are textbook lessons going to be unbundled and commoditized as well? If &#8216;user-generated content&#8217; is creating a content flood that is burying professional content, couldn&#8217;t a &#8216;teacher-generated content&#8217; driven social network do the same thing to educational publishing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
